(So that, ideally, after closing process the duplicate banner would contain links to some or all of the subquestions.) This did not happen, but at least the links are available in the comments and in the sidebar. I hoped that other users will notice alternative links in comments and perhaps choose some other post as a duplicate target. I am aware that duplicate is not ideal choice, but it seemed to be less harsh on a new user and in a comment I have added an explanation that one post should not contain several questions together with link to the relevant discussion on meta. (I have even asked in chat which of the two possibilities is better, but I got no reply.) So it should be either closed for the reason the it contains multiple questions or as a duplicate. The question Help on Surjection, Injection, and Bijection basically consists of four different question, all of which have been answered on this site in the past. Anyway, some saving grace comes from the fact that the modulus differs from a power of two by one, and that can be exploited. This underlines what is IMNSHO wrong about the profileration of the replicas - nine more or less identical answers within half an hour from a bunch of users picking low hanging fruits ( open).And another one about the last digit of a power of seven ( open).This question is about calculating the last digit of a high power of $3$ ( open).This question is about calculating the remainder of a high power of $3$ modulo $35$ ( open).This is because some votes were cast when the list was shorter, and it is natural that different voters feel differently about different items on the list. OBSERVE: Votes on this answer may not reflect the popular opinion about individual questions on the list. Before acting I recommend that you also study this thread where several relevant points were raised in the answers. This post explaining the basic techniques in modular arithmetic. NOTE: This post is about collecting links to different posts that I think should be closed as duplicates of Or, just wait 24 hours after your vote then it is very likely the post has passed review. A more laborious alternative is to look in close votes review history, which however allows to track reviews in process. If the close votes are less than week old, it is possible that they are not in the last data dump. Alternative ways are using this SEDE query by entering the question id. We'll see how things evolve.Ģ You can find review for a particular post - if the review is already finished - from the post timeline. For example, if just one vote is missing you might consider posting there instead.ġ Other smaller coordination-tasks related to duplicate management, such as proposals for reversals of duplicate directions, could also happen here. In short, the system is the same as in the thread for reopening and undeleting.)Ī more low-key way to draw attention to a possible duplicate is this chat room, which has been created for similar purposes. (And if question is reopened again, this should be marked in the same place. This will help other users to see which request have already been resolved. After the question is closed, mark this clearly at the beginning of the post.If it turns out that discussion grows long and that it is contentious whether the particular question is indeed a duplicate, the question might deserve a separate post on meta.Or a brief explanation which of the two posts is more suitable as the duplicate target.) (Maybe short discussion why they are duplicates, if it is not clear that they are indeed duplicates. ![]() So your post should probably contain at least some brief explanation in addition to links to the duplicates. Keep in mind that very short answers are automatically turned into comments.In particular, you should have cast already a vote or flag, the question already has been through the close votes review queue, and it was still not marked as duplicate. Only use this thread if the usual means did not work.Do not use this thread for other types of closures, it is only for duplicates.1 The creation of this thread was decided here. The main use case are situations where a first attempt at duplicate closure was not successful. This thread is intended to help with closure of duplicates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |